[bristle.wordpress.com] Oops! Police at the Climate Camp in Kent have dropped a clanger – or more specifically a copy of their demonstrators=turrists handbook, the NETCU Policing Protest Pocket Legislation Guide (“For Police Use Only”). NETCU? Who they? Well, the National Extremism Tactical Coordination Unit
“forms part of the national policing response to domestic extremism”,
and gives advice to individual police forces and other ‘enforcement
agencies’ relating to this. There’s even a handy little biography on
the inside page of Policing Protest (with even handier contact details):
NETCU provides tactical advice and guidance on policing
single-issue domestic extremism. The unit also supports companies and
other organisations that are the targets of domestic extremism
campaigns. NETCU reports through the National Coordinator for Domestic
Extremism (NCDE) to the Association of Chief Police Officers Terrorism
and Allied Matters – ACPO(TAM) committee.National Extremism Tactical Coordination Unit (NETCU)
PO Box 525, Huntingdon, PE29 9AL
Tel: 01480 425091
Fax: 01480 425007
Email: mailbox@netcu.pnn.police.uk
Web: www.netcu.org.ukFreedom of Information
The Freedom of Information Act 2000 applies to public authorities in
England and Wales. Under the Act, organisations listed in Schedule 1 to
the Act – either by name or by description – have to provide public
access to information they hold. NETCU is not a public authority as
defined by Schedule 1 and therefore there are no obligations on NETCU
to disclose information under the Act. Police forces are advised not to release this guide following freedom of information requests.Edition 2 – November 2007
It could be seen as a successor to projects such as ARNI,
the Animal RIghts National Index which was subsequently rolled out to
encompass a wide range of environmental and social activists.
One can also see it in the context of the ‘Green Scare‘, the post-COINTELPRO pursuit of the ELF and others in the United States.
And let us also consider NETCU’s targeting of groups it considers to
be engaged in ‘tertiary terrorism’ (most notably animal rights
campaigns such as SHAC).
From creating databases which log the activities of entirely lawful
groups and individuals, through to the arbitrary casting of
politically-motivated behaviours beyond the spheres of the lawful,
unlawful or criminal into the less rationally-bound romper room
labelled terrorism (with all its attendant emotional responses); that
is the nature of the NETCU game.
In other words, through bureaucratic manoeuvring, artless sophistry
and ideologically-motivated authoritarianism, NETCU shifts the
goalposts for what passes for legal protest. Thus a terrorist is not
defined by her or his actions, but by having been labelled a terrorist
(by way of ‘domestic extremist’). Thus terrorism is not “the systematic
use of terror, esp as a means of coercion” (Penguin Pocket English Dictionary, 1990), it is any activity undertaken by those previously defined by the new terms of reference as ‘terrorists’.
That the NETCU website is liberally sprinkled with pictures of
yogurt-weaving peace marchers, clowns(!) and, erm, the Countryside
Alliance should give an indication of exactly whom the organisation
considers a ‘domestic extremist’ – that’s right, pretty much anyone who
ever dares dissent from the Westminster-approved script.
So read the Policing Protest book and find out how you should behave
in future lest you accidentally become a dangerous terrorist.
Links:
- Policing Protest story on IndyMedia (part 1)
- Policing Protest story on IndyMedia (part 2)
- Policing Protest (PDF) (v1)
- NETCU Watch (anti-NETCU blog)
Source: http://bristle.wordpress.com
