[theregister.co.uk] The European Court of Human Rights said last year that DNA data
should not be indefinitely retained from those who have not been
charged or convicted.
RegAd(‚mpu1‘, ‚reg.public_sector.4159/policing‘, ‚pos=top;sz=336×280‘, VCs);
<a href="http://ad.uk.doubleclick.net/jump/reg.public_sector.4159/policing;tile=2;pos=top;dcove=d;sz=336×280;ord=Sy9rysCoZGUAAHeZdi4AAAB5?" target="_blank"><img class=" ecmkdlrhmlcxuuanaawd" src="http://ad.uk.doubleclick.net/ad/reg.public_sector.4159/policing;tile=2;pos=top;dcove=d;sz=336×280;ord=Sy9rysCoZGUAAHeZdi4AAAB5?" alt=""></a>
The government plans to delete some such profiles, hoping to bring
the UK into line with the law, but it’s emerged they do not plan to
delete the accompanying identity data on the Police National Computer.
In 2005, changes to DNA procedures meant a PNC record was created each time a sample was taken, The Observer reports. These records won’t be deleted as part of the response to the human rights ruling.
The Information Commissioner’s Office raised concerns that police
retention of data from innocent people could damage their prospects via
employment background checks.
"The commissioner is concerned that the very existence of a police
identity record created as a result of a DNA sample being taken on
arrest could prejudice the interests of the individual to whom it
relates by creating inaccurate assumptions about his or her criminal
past," it said.
Lobby group Liberty added: "Government has fed a culture where
arrest might as well be conviction, and suspicion equals guilt. In this
climate, a permanent record of suspicion can seriously damage the life
chances of any young person who has ever had their collar felt by the
It may yet prove that the Home Office has to revise its changes to
DNA retention. The Council of Europe, responsible for ensuring
governments comply with human rights rulings, has said it is not yet convinced the deletion plans go far enough.