By David Hambling
Police
forces all over the UK will soon be able to draw on unmanned aircraft
from a national fleet, according to Home Office plans. Last month it
was revealed that modified military aircraft drones will carry out
surveillance on everyone from protesters and antisocial motorists to
fly-tippers, and will be in place in time for the 2012 Olympics.
[wired.co.uk] Surveillance is only the start, however. Military drones quickly
moved from reconnaissance to strike, and if the British police follow
suit, their drones could be armed — but with non-lethal weapons rather
than Hellfire missiles.
The flying robot fleet will range from
miniature tactical craft such as the miniature AirRobot being tested by
Essex police, to BAE System’s new HERTI drone
as flown in Afghanistan. The drones are cheaper than police helicopters
— some of which will be retired — and are as wide as 12m in the case
of HERTI.
Watching events on the ground without being able to
act is frustrating. Targets often got away before an unarmed drone
could summon assistance. In fact, in 2000 it was reported that an
airborne drone spotted Osama bin Laden but could do nothing but watch
him escape. So the RAF has been carrying out missions in Afghanistan
with missile-armed Reapers since 2007. From the ground these just look
like regular aircraft.
The police have already had a similar
experience with CCTV. As well as observing, some of these are now
equipped with speakers. Pioneered in Middleborough, the talking CCTV
allows an operator to tell off anyone engaging in vandalism, graffiti
or littering.
Unmanned aircraft can also be fitted with speakers, such as the Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD), which could not only warn fly tippers that they were breaking the law but also be loud enough to drive them away.
The
LRAD is a highly directional speaker made of a flat array of
piezoelectric transducers, producing intense beam of sound in a
30-degree cone. It can be used as a loudhailer, or deafen the target
with a jarring, discordant noise. Some ships now carry LRAD as an
anti-pirate measure: It was used to drive off an attack on the Seabourn
Spirit off Somalia in 2005.
LRAD makers American Technology
prefer to call its product a device rather than a weapon, and use terms
such as "deterrent tones" and "influencing behaviour." Police in the US
have already adopted a vehicle-mounted LRAD for crowd control, breaking
up protests at the G20 summit in Pittsburgh last year, although there
have been warnings about the risk of hearing damage.
The LRAD
has been tested on the Austrian S-100 unmanned helicopter, and the
technology is ready if there is a police requirement.
But rather
than just driving them away, a police drone should be able to stop
fleeing criminals in their tracks. Helicopters already mount powerful
searchlights, and strobe lighting capabilities can turn such systems
into effective nonlethal weapons. High-intensity strobes can cause
dizziness, disorientation and loss of balance making it virtually
impossible to run away.
This effect was first harnessed in the
"Photic Driver" made by British company Allen International in 1973.
However, it has taken improvement in lighting technology (such as
fast-switching Xenon lights) and an understanding of the physiology
involved to make such weapons practical.
A "light based personnel immobilisation device" developed by Peak Beam Systems Inc has been successfully tested by the US military, and work to mount it on an unmanned helicopter in the States is under way.
This
sort of light would be too dangerous for a manned aircraft because of
the crew being affected. But an unmanned "strober" could be a literal
crime stopper, and something we could see deployed within the next
couple of years.
Even the smallest drones could be used for
tactical police operations. As far back as 1972 the Home Office looked
at model aircraft as an alternative to rubber bullets, literally flying
them into rioters to knock them off their feet.
French company Tecknisolar Seni has demonstrated a portable drone armed with a double-barrelled 44mm Flash-Ball gun.
Used by French special police units, the one-kilo Flash-Ball resembles
a large calibre handgun and fires non-lethal rounds, including tear gas
and rubber impact rounds to bring down a suspect without permanent
damage — "the same effect as the punch of a champion boxer," claim
makers Verney-Carron.
However, last year there were questions
over the use of Flash-Ball rounds by French police. Like other impact
rounds, the Flash-Ball is meant to be aimed at the body — firing from
a remote, flying platform is likely to increase the risk of head
injury.
Another option is the taser. Taser stun guns are now
so light (about 150 grams) that they could be mounted on the smaller
drones. Antoine di Zazzo, head of SMP Technologies, which distributes
tasers in France, says the company is fitting one to a small quad-rotor iDrone (another quad-rotor toy helicopter), which some have called a "flying saucer".
Robots
are already the preferred way of approaching possible bombs without
putting officers lives at risk. In the future, police may prefer to
deal with potentially dangerous suspects the same way, tackling them
remotely using a taser if the situation requires it.
But tasers
are controversial. In 2008 the Met rejected government plans for a
wider issue of tasers to non-specialist officers because of the fear
they could cause, and there have been numerous complaints of abuse. For
some, the arrival of a hovering law-enforcement drone with a video eyes
and a 50,000-volt taser at the ready might be a police technology too
far.
Which leads Wired to ask you for your thoughts: Are tasers
and armed robot drones the ideal next step for British law enforcement,
or will it just make our police officers less capable of dealing with
serious problems when they’re forced to intervene in person? Let us
know in the comments below.
Source: http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-02/10/future-police-meet-the-uk%27s-armed-robot-drones.aspx
